Sci-fi and fantasy authors don't always write all their novels in the same continuity. A budding new author's first published book might be about space pirates in the 27th century, while his sophomore effort might instead be about 21st century scientists reverse-engineering a flying saucer.
Traditional folktales never were. There are some good guys. There are some bad guys. The good guys win. The good guys are usually scrappy amateurs; the bad guys usually well-organized professionals with typical fascist precision.
The good guys usually demonstrate a respect for human life and the bonds of friendship; the bad guys betray their citizens and their underlings with equal abandon.
They gain their good guy or bad guy status by either following the universal law, or breaking it. Neither the Greeks nor Trojans are especially good nor villainous.
The Trojans lose some points for kidnapping a woman, but the Greeks lose some points for killing and enslaving an entire city. Neither side is scrappier or more professional than the other.
Neither seems to treat civilians better or demonstrate more loyalty. Nor was it on the mind of the authors of Mahabharata, the Norse sagas, Jack and the Beanstalk, et cetera. The article concludes this is because of nationalism.
Nation-states wanted their soldiers to imagine themselves as fighting on the side of good, against innately-evil cartoon-villain enemies. This was so compelling a vision that it shaped culture from then on: A Global History of Concentration Campsabout the rise of the idea that people on opposite sides of conflicts have different moral qualities, she told me: In short, we are rehearsing the idea that moral qualities belong to categories of people rather than individuals.
What are we to think of this? Robin Hood started stealing from the rich to give to the poor as early as the edition of his tale. The Mayan Hero Twins? Are there any differences between the way ancients and moderns looked at this?
Maybe modern stories seem more likely to have two clear sides eg made up of multiple different people separated by moral character.
Villains as opposed to monsters, or beings that are evil by their very nature seem more modern. So does the idea of heroes as necessarily scrappy, and villains as necessarily well-organized.
And just eyeballing it, modern stories seem to use this plot a lot more, and to have less deviation from the formula. The past stories seem much more conducive to blind nationalism than our own. The amorality of the warriors in the Iliad manifested as total loyalty: Hector fought for Troy not because Troy was in the right, but because he was a Trojan.
Achilles fought for Greece not because he believed in the Greek cause, but because that was his side and he was sticking to it. What more could a nationalist want? In contrast, the whole point of modern good-vs-evil is that you should choose sides based on principle rather than loyalty.
The article gets this exactly right in pointing out the literary motif of virtuous betrayal. We are expected to celebrate Darth Vader or Severus Snape virtuously betraying their dark overlords to help the good guys.
In Avatar, the main character decides his entire species is wrong and joins weird aliens to try to kill them, and this is good.Essay on Beowulf and Superman - A hero is defined in classical mythology as a man, especially the son of a god and a mortal, who is famous for possessing some extraordinary gift.
Beowulf, the title character of an epic poem and Superman, a more modern day hero are both prime examples.
Comparison beween Beowulf and Superman. superman, or spider man.
But in the ancient time, their also have a hero called Beowulf. He is the hero in the Anglo-Saxon history. In the story, he shows a lot of characters that a hero should have. When we compare Beowulf and superman, we can find a lot of similar point.
For instance, both of them. Beowulf, the hero of the epic poem Beowulf, and Superman, the man of steel from Marvel Comics, both act as superheroes of their time, gaining the admiration of all the people looking on.
Both Beowulf and Superman must embark of journeys of their own to reach the people who are in need of their help. Beowulf is a warrior and superman is a "hero," both fight for others, they go where no one plans to go, and they both fend for themselves.
Beowulf plans to save the people from the monsters such as Grendel, and Grendel's mother, but superman tends to protect the world from his enemies, and protect himself from dying with the enemies wanting to.
Free Essays: Comparison of Beowulf and The Seafarer - A Comparison of Beowulf and The Seafarer Beowulf and The Seafarer In a comparison between “Beowulf” and “The Seafarer” one finds two contrasting beliefs . compare and contrast comparing beowolf with superman.
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window).