Breeching experiment

Army, a group of officers empanelled to examine or investigate certain matters, such as the: For example, the U. Artillery ordnance during the midth Century, in honor of their original designer — Col. For a visual example, view the video under nomenclature Bormann time-fuse Click here to view a larger still image of the Bormann Time-Fuze.

Breeching experiment

Politicians, Hollywood Stars, Big Business CEO's are likely already installed with implanted devices to incapacitate them where they do or say anything the NWO controllers don't like, or because they have a replacement person prefered for the position.

We are in a country among nations working to dominate our very lives, health and destiny. The NWO control is worldwide and intend to keep their control if they can. It's up to you to make sure they don't carry out their vampire nefarious plan without taking a stand.

You can do more than just complain, you will learn now what to do. Update on our Court Action: This is our second installment of information regarding our court case.

Breeching experiment

We have received extra phone calls from victims asking for information and or direct help. The requests are here answered for those that asked the questions and for those who may want to know. First we are not perfect, nor attorneys and financially unable to do more than what is presented here.

One of the questions asked was, would we help with another persons court case; we cannot give legal advise as it is considered illegal, we are going to give adequate review of our own complaint to give the victims an insight as to how to handle their own as a parallel.

The facts of how a victim should approach the problem of formulating their own complaint is a relative issue, as we believe as we have said on the first installment that a complaint should be entered into a State Court and not a Federal Court.

The reason for that is mentioned in the first installment. The first issue to face is that the authorities both state and federal are allowed to lie and keep the information you may be seeking where it is about yourself secret.

Because whether you're under human experimentation or some form of new bizarre form of trustee prisoner, you would be refused on the basis that an ongoing lawful investigation was being performed upon the person. Such topics must specify a time period and the actual information requested must be about some aspect that is not directly connected to the information you seek but is possible from the generic information to cause a perception that such as what you truly seek is likely to be present.

However evidence showing standing and harm will be needed to get the court to find for the Plaintiffs and order an answer from the Defendants.

In our first installment we made it clear that attorneys will not help us and we presume will not help any attack victim, due to the fact the attacks are being done under law, however they are unconstitutional.

We are "Pro Se" as a necessity, because lawyers will not touch this kind of problem; until someone establishes case law by winning. Now our Court update for June 15, is: The Court is currently hearing Defendants and Plaintiffs Motions. The Defendants always ask for a dismissal and have entered a Motion for dismissal, we the Plaintiffs Debbie and John have entered a cross motion to counter the Defendants Motion, that we believe is more than adequate for discounting and mooting the Defendants motion based on law.

Therefore we are currently awaiting the outcome of the Justices decision in this most important matter. The decision by the Justice regarding those motions is set for mid-July and neither Defendants or us Plaintiffs, Debbie and John are required to attend, so far as we know at this present time.

Our complaint asks that all New Yorkers who have been experimented on without their knowledge or consent must be notified by Defendants being New York authorities, when and if we win our case.

No public hearing is scheduled at this time. Where the Bills definition of "Prisoner" means any person who is subject to punishment, detention, incarceration, interrogation, intimidation or coercion. This Bill is to a great degree for the purpose of removing linkage of liability, of NYS, that the State not be held liable for the actions of medical personnel whom engage in aiding harsh and egregious treatment; is by the Bill implied to be applied on a case by case basis and is not a blanket statement for all medical personnel.

Nor intended as a Bill for indicating criminal activity by medical authorities. In essence the Bill is an unconstitutional effort of the NYS legislature to have on their books a law that places responsibility for wrong doing by medical personnel upon them alone, and further that the law by its wording leaves the medical personnel responsible to prove where sued that they had substantiation of adequate legal sanction, from whatever authority they operated under; such proof necessary for a medical practitioner to obtain from the authority they acted under has intrinsic barriers at present under for example Federal FISA and other authorities such as Military Tribunals.

The doctrine states that a law governing a specific subject matter lex specialis overrides a law which only governs general matters lex generalis.

Why did this block occur?

By the laws wording, it does not therefore actually prohibit medical personnel from engaging in aiding harsh and similar treatment where legally sanctioned, nor does it encompass or prohibit pain and suffering caused by human research or experimentation.

Human experimentation is not an issue covered by this Bill, except that the Bill excludes pain and suffering as an issue where they were caused from NYS waiver of consent human experimentation or research.

The NYS law does not state that there is a criminal penalty for medical personnel, by there not being any mention of any penalty, is inferring that it is merely a reportable condition of a medical personnel's activity, which may result in some peer review.

In the Bill there is no mention of addendum to criminal law, as a further indication there is no criminal penalty implied.The breaching experiment is a simple yet ingenious social psychology technique that explores people’s adherence to the unwritten social norms of society.

The experiment was developed by sociologist Harold Garfinkel and has become a favorite tool in teaching sociology and psychology students about the strength of social norms and social conformity. The Project Gutenberg EBook of Moby Dick; or The Whale, by Herman Melville This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever.

Jan 27,  · Of course I didn't do it, but it's an idea for a breaching experiment. Since then, I came up with two more ideas for breaching experiments.

The first is to sing a song at a public library and see what happens. 'Appropriate Tack And Fit For Horses, Mules & Donkeys' Not sure if this article is worth the read?

Why not let our testimonials help you decide!. By Marlene Quiring, Mammoth Mules. A breaching experiment goes outside our ideas of social norms specifically to see how people will react to the violation of the arbitrary rules of a given situation.

Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products.

Breeching experiment
Breaching experiment - Wikipedia