Originally published as 18 Am.
This is a review of literature spanning 64 years through The databases come from the medical sciences field PubMedothers that are heavily populated with non-criminology publications Scopus and social sciences heavily on Web of Knowledge.
The sources are light on criminology, though not exclusionary. The selection table is references to a web site that obscures the data. Limited confidence in studies due to design and execution. Highly critiqued by many. Used epidemiology measures not used in criminology specifically, incident rate rations as opposed to straight crime rates.
Cross-sectional study using only one external control variable unemployment rates. Cross sectional studies can be valid is a large number potential confounding variables.
State-level gun ownership data was not transparent. A scan of their site failed to show this poll, how it was conducted and thus there is no transparency on ownership rates. There were passages in the text that were transparently anti-gun in nature, often echoing word-by-word memes from con control organizations.
There is a lot of speculation, odd yet inappropriate examples, and outright inaccuracies. Indeed, Hemenway inaccurately used an epidemiology truth table in this paper to incorrectly explain survey response accuracy methods. Kleck determined guns preventedmurders when in fact it wasserious violent crimes.
In short, he used oranges to talk about apples. Foremost, the study is unbalanced. They did this to compare roughly the same gross number of people, but this leads to stacking the deck in terms of the type of state cultures. The cultural aspect is important.
The report skips by the most obvious issue, which is that most New York State crime guns come from New York. In other words, many or most of these guns may have been legally acquired and brought into the state by people moving there. This presents many problems: There is no statistical justification for this being the proper weighting.
The report admits that a small number of high density cities are responsible for nearly all traced crime guns, with NYC and the adjoining part of Long Island being the majority. But the report does not investigate why this very tight cluster is such a huge problem.
The latter is most important.For Release: Wednesday, January 17, Latest Edition of Annual Violence Policy Center Analysis Also Ranks States by Their Overall Gun Death Rates.
Washington, DC — Gun deaths in the U.S. have jumped 17 percent since the District of Columbia timberdesignmag.com decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that there is a right to keep a handgun in the home for self-defense, according to a new.
Jan 16, · Analysis: With gun control, Obama takes political chance. The beauty of a second term presidency, at least for the man in the Oval Office, is that political calculations become less important.
Here is why gun control groups oppose the practice. Los Angeles Times Not on our watch,” said Avery Gardiner, co-president of the Brady Campaign. More links. Brady on Twitter. 50 days until #Midterms elections. What are you doing to make sure our leaders work to prevent gun violence?
Ge. Many aspects of the gun control issue are best measured and sometimes can only be measured through surveys, but the accuracy of such surveys depends upon respondents providing truthful answers to questions that are sometimes controversial and potentially incriminating.
Thus, Just Facts uses this data critically, citing the best-designed surveys we find, detailing their inner workings in our. Executive Summary. The sale, possession, and use of firearms are regulated by the Australian states and territories, with cross-border trade matters addressed at the federal level.
I’ve been interested in firearm stopping power for a very long time. I remember reading Handguns magazine back in the late s when Evan Marshall was .